On 24. 01. 24 19:00, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 24.01.24 um 17:38 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 5 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since this is unfortunately after the branching,
packages will be retired on rawhide and f40.
I apologize for starting this process a bit later than required again.
Unfortunately, I had other work obligations.
Volunteers to take over this are always welcome.
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 37.
This report is based on dist tags.
Packages collected via:
https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb
If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
If you see a package that should be exempted from the process,
please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
Package (co)maintainers
================================================================================
freefem++ (maintained by: cicku, corsepiu)
freefem++-openmpi-4.14-3.fc40.x86_64 requires
libmpi.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
WTH is this? Your script seems broken.
This is a 2-level deep dependency on a package that fails to build.
Thanks for your feedback. Occasionally, "my" script is broken, but what you
reported is not actually incorrect. See further.
Neither is cicku a maintainer of freefem++
They are listed as such at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freefem++
nor did it fail to build.
It did not. It depends on openmpi which depends on infinipath-psm which fails
to build.
Actually
this package had been built several times in recent months/weeks. Koji lists it
as having been rebuilt today!
Correct.
And while we are at it: Why is cicku still listed as a maintainer?
I don't know.
He was removed from Fedora by force due to a FESCO decision many years ago. I
don't recall the details, but this can easily be 10 years ago.
Then, perhaps the removal was not complete.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
