On 22. 01. 24 20:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:55 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 22. 01. 24 19:07, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I am unaware of any remaining use cases for buildroot overrides that
are not covered by side tags. If you know of any, please speak up.
Every time somebody asks this, I say: Pull Requests CI
I opened https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/240 almost 3 years ago.
It works in CentOS Stream, but not in Fedora.
Without that, I sometimes need to create a buildroot override to be able to
test the the second package change before merging it.
This sounds a lot more like a workaround than a use-case, but it's
good to know about. So thank you.
Yes, it is.
Unfortunately, I feel like that workaround is dangerous, since it is
putting untested code into the buildroot.
In this case the PR-based CI has already passed for the build I add as a
buidlroot override.
I would like to see that get
fixed properly with support for the side tags.
I would like that very much. However, it seems it has not been a priority.
In the meantime, if we
otherwise disabled free-access buildroot overrides, this would
definitely be grounds for granting an exception.
How would that work? Would I ask FESCo every time I need to do it?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
