Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:54 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
Thanks, OK great. It would be helpful if you could provide a proposed
.src.rpm replacement for download and peer review to this list in a way
similar to an Extras package review request. That way folks here can
test it and suggest other improvements while we follow the process for
replacement in Fedora Core.
I suppose we want both Obsoletes and Provides of the N-V-R of libungif
and also matching -devel?
Here's a spec file for giflib that doesn't quite work. It's a port of
the libungif spec file with a few cleanups similar to what we'd do if
the package was moving to Fedora Extras.
Also is there any good reason why we should continue shipping the static
archive?
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
