On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:47:25PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney <amoloney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin > > > > I do not see as part of the plan a process to > go through all Fedora packages and identifying > binaries in /usr/bin that have the same name > as a binary in /usr/sbin (from the same, or > different packages) such that the packager > (or the multiple packages) will need to > coordinate the changes (perhaps by engaging > upstream). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin#Scope lists 9 packages that was aware of that use usermode. $ dnf5 repoquery -l $(dnf5 repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/sbin/*' --qf '%{name}\n') | rg '/usr/s?bin/' | sed -r 's|(.*)/([^/]*)$|\2|' | sort | uniq -c | rg -w 2 says that /usr/sbin/{makemap,rpcinfo,rpcbind,sestatus,udevadm} "shadow" files in /usr/bin. But those are all symlinks, i.e. they will need just to be dropped to prevent a FTBFS. I added this list with four packages to the Scope section. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
