On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:14:49AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:20:11AM +0100, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > > > Dne 20. 12. 23 v 20:53 Aoife Moloney napsal(a): > > > ** Adjust `%_sbindir` in `/usr/lib/rpm/macros` (part of `rpm` > > > package). Packages will be updated automatically during the mass > > > rebuild. > > > > > > Isn't the ultimate goal to drop the `%_sbindir` all together? Shouldn't at > > minimum the packaging guidelines be updated? We could probably drop the > > `%_sbindir` automatically in near future. I added a point about adjusting Packaging Guidelines to Scope section in the Change proposal. I don't think we want to drop %_sbindir anytime soon: people use the same specs for older Fedora releases, CentOS, RHEL, OpenSUSE, etc, and undefining %_sbindir would require a lot of updates and make it harder to share the specs. OTOH, keeping the one-line definition of the macro costs nothing. > That or another, I'd like this Change to explicitly state whether packagers are > supposed to keep using %_sbindir, or to replace it with %_bindir in their spec > files. I added that to Summary now: The definition of %_sbindir will be changed to %_bindir, so packages will start using the new directory after a rebuild without any further action. Maintainers may stop using %_sbindir, but don't need to. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
