On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test > > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do > > not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a > > podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is > > here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. > > Hi, > > we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with > podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just > built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update > for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compat-0.9.x > also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that > need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires line. Bump in the new year. PTAL. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
