On 17.12.23 17:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test
builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do
not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a
podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is
here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
Hi,
we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with
podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just
built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update
for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compat-0.9.x
also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that
need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires line.
Hi
I've done so: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e8f9188f10
Sandro
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
