On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;( > > > > Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this? > > Yeah, honestly, I'm not sure a Change is the right way to go about > this, it seems like it could just be handled between maintainers. > nforro - who maintains mailx - has not committed to it for two years, > but is very active on other packages (adding him to CC). If he is OK > with the change, I would think you could just go ahead and do it (have > nforro retire mailx) without needing to go through the Change process. I CC'd him (and tkorbar) on the first mail in this thread, and I only started this thread after emailing them directly to discuss it (I probably should have mentioned that I'd already run it by them). Nikola suggested in that private discussion that retiring mailx was probably the way to go, so I started this thread. > If you file a Change, I think all that will happen is that a lot more > bureaucracy will happen before somebody says "hey, we'd better ask > nforro about this" anyway. :D I think he's already on board with the change, and I think everybody would be happier to Just Do It without a change proposal. I just wanted to start a discussion and make sure the right process was followed. It sounds like I'm not the only person to waste time scratching my head at the heirloom-mailx fossil, and so we should just retire it! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
