Re: Should we retire the mailx package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;( 
> 
> Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this?

Yeah, honestly, I'm not sure a Change is the right way to go about
this, it seems like it could just be handled between maintainers.
nforro - who maintains mailx - has not committed to it for two years,
but is very active on other packages (adding him to CC). If he is OK
with the change, I would think you could just go ahead and do it (have
nforro retire mailx) without needing to go through the Change process.

If you file a Change, I think all that will happen is that a lot more
bureaucracy will happen before somebody says "hey, we'd better ask
nforro about this" anyway. :D
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.happyassassin.net



--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux