Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Also, since this is essentially an SONAME change wrt zlib, the initial > build and mini-mass-rebuild of all dependents should occur in a side- > tag. You're announcement doesn't mention this occurring. There are no SONAME changes. With zlib we have: $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 zlib-1.2.13-5.fc40.x86_64 $ readelf -a /usr/lib64/libz.so.1.2.13 | grep -i soname 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libz.so.1] With zlib-ng-compat we have: $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 zlib-ng-compat-2.1.3-7.fc40.x86_64 $ readelf -a /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 | grep soname 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libz.so.1] No mass rebuilds are required. zlib-ng in compat mode aims to be API and ABI compatible with zlib. -- Tulio Magno -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
