On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:08 PM David King <amigadave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important > changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages > to fail to build without modification, including: > > * several functions now accept or return a const xmlError struct > * cyclic dependencies in header files were fixed (by dropping some > includes) Sorry if the answer to this question is obvious - but shouldn't breaking changes like these cause an soname bump? I realize the whole "unintentional" part - but if these changes also affect ABI (the first sounds like it might do that), dependent packages would need to be rebuilt either way, wouldn't they? Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
