Fabio Valentini wrote:
> There's a difference between *claiming* LSB compliance (what you refer
> to as backwards compatibility ?) and actually *achieving* it.
> Claiming it (the thing we objected to) without achieving it (i.e. the
> status quo for many Fedora releases) is a lie that helps nobody.
True, but the issue is that FESCo sees the bug in the claim and not in the
failure to achieve it, which is where the real issue lies.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
