On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 1:30 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > * AGREED: Fedora explicitly declines to support the LSB 5.0 or > > earlier. Packagers will remove any information that implies > > otherwise. No implementation of an LSB package may expressly state > > or offer compliance for any LSB module that Fedora does not or > > cannot comply with. (+6, 0, 0) (Son_Goku, 17:59:18) > > So Fedora has completely discarded any notion of backwards compatibility. > Sad. There's a difference between *claiming* LSB compliance (what you refer to as backwards compatibility ?) and actually *achieving* it. Claiming it (the thing we objected to) without achieving it (i.e. the status quo for many Fedora releases) is a lie that helps nobody. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
