On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:19 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dne 31. 10. 23 v 18:21 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:47 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> How it conflicts? >> >> %files >> >> %license LICENSE >> >> %files doc >> >> %license LICENSE >> >> should not create any conflicts. And this is recomended way to do it. > > > I guess the conflicts happen when the LICENSE file changes between builds and individual subpackages that ship it aren't updated in lock step. Often there is a full NVR version requirement that locks individual subpackages together, but not in this case. If people for example download just one of the subpackages from koji (and not the other), it can lead to only one of them getting updated. > > License from subpackage goes to different directory. See: > > $ rpm -qf /usr/share/licenses/llvm/LICENSE.TXT > llvm-17.0.2-1.fc39.x86_64 > $ rpm -qf /usr/share/licenses/llvm-libs/LICENSE.TXT > llvm-libs-17.0.2-1.fc39.x86_64 > > llvm-libs-17.0.2-1.fc39.i686 > > so license from llvm and llvm-libs should not never conflicts because the file goes to different directory. > > What can conflict is multilib packages in different version with different content of the file. > The cmake-doc package reuses the license and doc directories from the main package and ships them. That's why the conflict exists. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
