Re: F39 candidate composes coming - here's the plan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 11:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop regarding F39 plans.
> 
> As you may have noticed, we've slipped once or twice already (depending
> on whether you count the "early target date") and are in danger of
> slipping again. The go/no-go meeting is scheduled for tomorrow (2023-
> 10-26). The outstanding blockers are all Raspberry Pi-related, aside
> from the shim one we've been waiving for several releases and intend to
> waive again.
> 
> Matthew Miller, Kevin Fenzi and I came up with this plan: we're going
> to run a compose right now without fixes for the two outstanding Pi
> blockers (2241252 and 2244305). If QA can get sufficient testing on
> this done by the go/no-go meeting, we can discuss the possibility of
> shipping it and noting that there are known issues with Raspberry Pi
> that are taking time to resolve, and Pi users should not install or
> upgrade to F39 until they're resolved (or something like that).
> 
> If at any point a fix for 2241252 shows up, we'll run another compose
> with the fix included. If that gets sufficient testing by the time of
> the meeting, we can also consider that as a candidate to ship. If ARM
> team decide to attempt a fix for 2244305 we'd also pull that in, but if
> not, we think it's reasonable to consider revoting or waiving that bug,
> as it seems not to happen very commonly or consistently and the
> proposed "fix" apparently comes with tradeoffs of some kind.
> 
> So, QA folks, please stand ready to test one or two candidate composes
> soon. If we wind up with two, we will consider most test results to
> apply to both, as the only difference should be uboot-tools; we would
> want to run ARM hardware tests, at least, on both composes if possible.
> The usual announcement mails will be sent for the completed composes.
> 
> Thanks folks!

Update on this: the first candidate without Pi fixes is done and
currently available for testing - see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_RC_1.1_Summary .
The second candidate is running, when it is done,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_RC_1.2_Summary
will be live.

Most tests of either candidate will be valid for both, but we
especially would like testing of the second candidate (when it's done)
on ARM hardware - obviously on Raspberry Pi, but also on any other ARM
hardware folks have lying around. We ended up having to revert uboot-
tools to an older version to try and address the Pi issues, so we need
to check that hasn't broken anything else important. If you run into
problems, please file a bug, propose it as a release blocker, and maybe
reply here just to be sure :)

Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.happyassassin.net



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux