On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on > > gitlab > > as part of CentOS Stream. > > We all know or should know that this is false. It's easy enough to > disprove with a counterexample: > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1918 > > Try to find the code for that webkit2gtk3-2.36.7-1.el9_1.3.src.rpm in > CentOS Stream. It isn't there, and never will be. > The *exact* set of source code that the package was built for is included in the Source RPM and all of the individual changes that comprised it are part of the c9s branch in CentOS Stream (or the maintainer has been regressing code, in which case that should be addressed). No, the git repo might not contain a specific git reference that directly matches the SRPM you cite, but that's not at all the same thing as "the code isn't available in git". _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
