On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:38 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:06 AM Alexander Sosedkin <asosedkin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > > Feel free to strike down these proposals > > using whatever mechanisms Fedora governance offers. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings3 > > rejection suggests they do work. > > To be clear, that one was rejected primarily because of Chrome and > VSCode (both extremely important to our user-base), which appear to > have been resolved since then. I'm definitely in favor of tightening > things up at this point. You're probably thinking about the revert I wanna revert: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960. StrongCryptoSettings3 was a different, more ambitious thing, where preventing openssl from trusting SHA-1 signatures was the contention point that prevented it from happening. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
