Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:06 AM Alexander Sosedkin <asosedkin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> Feel free to strike down these proposals
> using whatever mechanisms Fedora governance offers.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings3
> rejection suggests they do work.

To be clear, that one was rejected primarily because of Chrome and
VSCode (both extremely important to our user-base), which appear to
have been resolved since then. I'm definitely in favor of tightening
things up at this point.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux