Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello team,

I don't want to enter a terrain where I don't belong, but I want to express my opinion. Since I understand that you don't want to and don't like the discourse interface, please take into account community participation in discussions. And my example is going to be the controversial "Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation", on ML, we have 99 comments, but in discourse we are over 500. Maybe it's bad on my part to assume that you want to actual listen to community feedback and not only to devs and packager feedback. The process is experimental and needs to be adjusted, yes; e.g: I propose to don't split discussion in different topics.

I hope you don't drop the discourse, and if you do I will try to keep the pace a put the proposals into discourse to make them more visible to the community (adding that the discussion is happening in the ML).


Best regards,
--
Eduard Lucena
Móvil: +56962318010
GNU/Linux User #589060
Ubuntu User #8749
Fedora Marketing Representative
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux