Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Error: 
 Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - package default-fonts-cjk-sans-4.0-8.fc39.noarch from fedora
requires google-noto-sans-cjk-vf-fonts, but none of the providers can
be installed
  - package default-fonts-cjk-sans-4.0-9.fc39.noarch from updates-
testing requires google-noto-sans-cjk-vf-fonts, but none of the
providers can be installed
 Problem 2: conflicting requests
  - package default-fonts-core-math-4.0-8.fc39.noarch from fedora
requires google-noto-sans-math-fonts, but none of the providers can be
installed
  - package default-fonts-core-math-4.0-9.fc39.noarch from updates-
testing requires google-noto-sans-math-fonts, but none of the providers
can be installed






On Wed, 2023-08-23 at 20:22 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>  
>  # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
>  # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
> again
>  sudo dnf module reset '*'
> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
>  --enablerepo=updates-testing \
>  $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
>  --assumeno distro-sync
> 
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will
> reveal potential problems. 
> You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
>  
> The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make
> the actual upgrade.
> 
> In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the
> appropriate package. 
> Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed
> in Fedora 39. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-
> packages first:
>  https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
> and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install"
> (F39FailsToInstall) reports:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2168845&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=12486533
> 
> Two notes:
> * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new
> dnf.
> * this command found zero issues on my personal system - great work
> all everybody!
> 
> Thank you
>  Miroslav 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux