Hi,
I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM and I'm writing a Fedora System-Wide Change for Fedora 40. The upgrade process would involve a manual procedure where the user needs to run a conversion tool for the database. Is this acceptable?
An automation process could be created, but the location of the database is configurable, which increases its complexity and effort. Especially for a PAM module that is not widely used. Another option I can think of is to automate the conversion process for the default location, and leave the manual conversion for those using a tuned location. Would that be acceptable?
--
Iker Pedrosa
Senior Software Engineer, Identity Management team
Txapela (gorria) buruan eta ibili munduan
(Red) hat on his head and walk the world
| |
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
