Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 22:07 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 21:50, Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It could be improved by using TOFU, so that the window of impersonation
> > is small, but requires clients to cache an association and then has
> > weird failure modes to be dealt with if one of the actors get re-imaged
> > or changes the cert for any reason.
> 
> I was thinking of implementing TOFU; good idea or bad idea?

That depends on how you are going to handle re-installs of peers in the
network where the certificate will start mismatching ...

How do you handle certificate expiration ?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux