Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:19, Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My understanding was that Microsoft found their own 'share updates' not working as much as expected

Hmm, I heard the opposite; can you give any more info? They have way
more telemetry than we do, and I was told it would not "be feasible"
to continue WU without the peer-to-peer functionality built into
windows. According to them they even have some kind of IPv6 tunnel
thing going on which seems alarming if true.

> either by network scans

As in "port 27500 exists you have a security problem" kind of scans?

> or just the fact that as soon as someone puts up a service like this.. it is profitable for the crooks to abuse it.

Probably my naivety, but what kind of things did you have in mind?

devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:
Do not reply to spam, report it:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux