On 8/23/23 20:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems.
You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade.
In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package.
Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 39. Please
check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first:
https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F39FailsToInstall) reports:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2168845&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=12486533
Two notes:
* you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf.
* this command found zero issues on my personal system - great work all everybody!
Thank you
Miroslav
sudo dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
Problem 1: problem with installed package mangohud-0.6.9.1-1.fc38.i686
- package mangohud-0.6.9-1.fc39.i686 from fedora requires libfmt.so.9, but none of the
providers can be installed
- package mangohud-0.6.9-1.fc39.i686 from updates-testing-modular requires libfmt.so.9,
but none of the providers can be installed
- mangohud-0.6.9.1-1.fc38.i686 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- fmt-9.1.0-2.fc38.i686 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
Problem 2: problem with installed package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64
- package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free requires
mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 23.1.5, but none of the providers can be installed
- mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- mesa-filesystem-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
-> RPMFusion issue probably
Problem 3: problem with installed package mangohud-0.6.9.1-1.fc38.x86_64
- package mangohud-0.6.9.1-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires
libspdlog.so.1.11()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package mangohud-0.6.9-1.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libspdlog.so.1.11()(64bit),
but none of the providers can be installed
- package mangohud-0.6.9-1.fc39.x86_64 from updates-testing-modular requires
libspdlog.so.1.11()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- spdlog-1.11.0-5.fc38.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
Problem 4: problem with installed package mesa-dri-drivers-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64
- package mesa-dri-drivers-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires
mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39, but none of the providers can be installed
- package mesa-dri-drivers-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.x86_64 from updates-testing-modular requires
mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both mesa-filesystem-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.x86_64 from fedora and
mesa-filesystem-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System
- cannot install both mesa-filesystem-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.x86_64 from
updates-testing-modular and mesa-filesystem-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System
- package mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free requires
mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 23.1.5, but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64
- mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- mesa-dri-drivers-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
Problem 5: package steam-1.0.0.78-2.fc39.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree requires
mesa-dri-drivers(x86-32), but none of the providers can be installed
- mesa-dri-drivers-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.i686 from updates-testing-modular does not belong
to a distupgrade repository
- mesa-dri-drivers-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.i686 from fedora does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- package mesa-dri-drivers-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires
mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39, but none of the providers can be installed
- package mesa-dri-drivers-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.x86_64 from updates-testing-modular requires
mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both mesa-filesystem-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.x86_64 from fedora and
mesa-filesystem-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System
- cannot install both mesa-filesystem-23.2.0~rc2-3.fc39.x86_64 from
updates-testing-modular and mesa-filesystem-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System
- problem with installed package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc38.i686
- mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc38.i686 from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc39.i686 from rpmfusion-free does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires
mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 23.1.5, but none of the providers can be installed
- package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.1.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free requires
mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 23.1.5, but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package steam-1.0.0.78-1.fc38.i686
- package mesa-dri-drivers-23.1.5-1.fc38.i686 from @System requires mesa-libglapi(x86-32)
= 23.1.5-1.fc38, but none of the providers can be installed
- steam-1.0.0.78-1.fc38.i686 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- mesa-libglapi-23.1.5-1.fc38.i686 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or
'--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages
-> RPMFusion issue.
Not sure about mangohud? it says package mangohud-0.6.9-1.fc39.x86_64 from
updates-testing-modular, yet it is installed from the updates repo:
Name : mangohud
Version : 0.6.9.1
Release : 1.fc38
Architecture : i686
Size : 1.6 M
Source : mangohud-0.6.9.1-1.fc38.src.rpm
Repository : @System
From repo : updates
Summary : Vulkan overlay layer for monitoring FPS, temperatures, CPU/GPU load and more
URL : https://github.com/flightlessmango/MangoHud
License : MIT
Description : A modification of the Mesa Vulkan overlay. Including GUI improvements,
: temperature reporting, and logging capabilities.
:
: To install GUI front-end:
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
