Dne 21. 08. 23 v 10:32 Florian Weimer
napsal(a):
Fixed. Nice catch. Thank you.Over the time we had several workshops about SPDX. Some people did the SPDX migrations for others (me included). Some of the PR are not merged yet. E.g. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/251The License: field is incomplete, it needs to pick up the autoconf exception.
In past I waited until it is merged. Now I plan to be more progressive and I plan in these individual cases to: 1) create PR 2) wait 14 days 3) if there will be no response, the I will merge it as a proven packager.I assume you plan to translate just the License: field and not look at the actual license references in the source code for this. If that approach is acceptable, package maintainers could do the same thing. It would significantly speed up the conversion (e.g., no need to run fossology).
No. I on these workshops we have done the full work. Not just
plain translation of License field. But as you saw above - nobody
is perfect.
-- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
