Re: Heads up: merging SPDX related PRs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Miroslav Suchý:

> Over the time we had several workshops about SPDX. Some people did the SPDX migrations for others (me included).
>
> Some of the PR are not merged yet. E.g.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/251

The License: field is incomplete, it needs to pick up the autoconf
exception.

> In past I waited until it is merged. Now I plan to be more progressive
> and I plan in these individual cases to:
>
> 1) create PR
>
> 2) wait 14 days
>
> 3) if there will be no response, the I will merge it as a proven packager.

I assume you plan to translate just the License: field and not look at
the actual license references in the source code for this.  If that
approach is acceptable, package maintainers could do the same thing.  It
would significantly speed up the conversion (e.g., no need to run
fossology).

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux