On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 15:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 19:59 +0200, Nicola Sella wrote: > > > > 2. If you would rather not use the side-tag OR you are updating after the > > packages are available in rawhide, you should have no issues. The same two > > options follow: > > The update will not land in Rawhide as-is because the removal of any > `dnf` command on a typical update breaks almost all of the openQA > tests. > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5fd964c1bf#comment-3149533 > > If we're really fine with leaving Rawhide systems with no `dnf` on > update, we will have to do some work to work around this in the test > system so as not to break tests on all subsequent updates. Also, there > needs to be a PR for fedora-comps to revert the dnf5 migration there > (and anywhere else it happened). Correction - it seems the comps PR was already merged, https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/866 . I just looked at open PRs, so I didn't see it. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
