Re: Replacing DNF with DNF5: changes reverted and helping steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 19:59 +0200, Nicola Sella wrote:
> 
> 2. If you would rather not use the side-tag OR you are updating after the
> packages are available in rawhide, you should have no issues. The same two
> options follow:

The update will not land in Rawhide as-is because the removal of any
`dnf` command on a typical update breaks almost all of the openQA
tests.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5fd964c1bf#comment-3149533

If we're really fine with leaving Rawhide systems with no `dnf` on
update, we will have to do some work to work around this in the test
system so as not to break tests on all subsequent updates. Also, there
needs to be a PR for fedora-comps to revert the dnf5 migration there
(and anywhere else it happened). 
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.happyassassin.net



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux