Re: GNOME 45.beta builds for Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 12:24 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> It's also fine to build directly in rawhide if it's just a single
> package update that doesn't depend on anything else. We are still a
> while from Bodhi activation point for F39 so we won't be doing
> mega-updates yet that require everything to be built together in a
> single side tag.

Well, that's a bit of a wrongly-named milestone these days.
*Everything* goes through Bodhi all the time. The only thing that
changes at the "Bodhi activation point" these days is that the
time/karma requirements kick in. So I'm a bit confused as to why you'd
do a mega-update for branched releases but not for Rawhide? What's the
difference?
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.happyassassin.net



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux