Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I've been actually using dnf5 daily and while it's a little rough
> around the edges it seems usable enough.

I agree, I would like to see dnf5 staying in rawhide.
Otherwise I don't think it will receive sufficient testing.

> (1) The allow_vendor_change option makes things strange.  I think this
> feature should be turned off (ie True) until it is fixed properly.
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/722

(I believe this happened upstream already. :)

Jens
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux