On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 23:04 +0100, Naheem Zaffar wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, 21:23 Kevin Fenzi, <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Samantha Bueno <sbueno@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora > > > > 39 and, perhaps notably, Fedora 40 as well. > > > > > > For those of us who upgraded to DNF05 in rawhide to test it, is there a > > > quick reference for our paths forward? Er, backward? I upgraded at the > > > wrong time and spent half a day recovering my system, I'd rather avoid > > > that if I have to go back to DNF04... > > > > I would expect a revert back to where /usr/bin/dnf is dnf4 (but > > hopefully dnf5 is still available/seperate). > > > > Dont they have different/incompatible database formats/locations where > dnf4 does not track updates via dnf5 and vice versa? Sure, but that's not really a problem. We've had both available in parallel for quite a long time now. The situation Kevin describes (/usr/bin/dnf is dnf4, you can install dnf5 and get /usr/bin/dnf5 alongside it if you like) is what was the state in Rawhide for several months before we flipped it so dnf5 provided /usr/bin/dnf , and is still the state in F38. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
