On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 12:05 AM Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, 21:23 Kevin Fenzi, <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: >> > Samantha Bueno <sbueno@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > > We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora >> > > 39 and, perhaps notably, Fedora 40 as well. >> > >> > For those of us who upgraded to DNF05 in rawhide to test it, is there a >> > quick reference for our paths forward? Er, backward? I upgraded at the >> > wrong time and spent half a day recovering my system, I'd rather avoid >> > that if I have to go back to DNF04... >> >> I would expect a revert back to where /usr/bin/dnf is dnf4 (but >> hopefully dnf5 is still available/seperate). > > > > Dont they have different/incompatible database formats/locations where dnf4 does not track updates via dnf5 and vice versa? As far as I know, the database that keeps transaction history and the database that keeps track of why packages are installed have different formats. But neither of these should affect normal operation (installing / updating packages etc.). Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
