Dear all, We are retiring python-pytest-flake8. It FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226304 and abandoned upstream: https://github.com/tholo/pytest-flake8/issues/98 (some suggest using ruff instead) and in addition, running linters in %check is discouraged anyway: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_linters I did a dependency analysis a couple of days ago and only python-nashpy popped up, this was a leftover because of manually specified test dependencies since fixed in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nashpy/pull-request/2 And there are no more dependents. If I miss anything in this query -- your package is FTBFS already anyway after the mass rebuild, so please remove the dependency. ``` michel in fedora/reviews/other took 13m39s ⬢ [fedora-toolbox:38] ❯ rpmdistro-repoquery fedora rawhide --enablerepo=fedora-source --whatrequires python-pytest-flake8 Fedora rawhide - x86_64 19 MB/s | 73 MB 00:03 Fedora rawhide - Source 7.2 MB/s | 8.1 MB 00:01 Fedora rawhide - x86_64 - Updates 1.2 MB/s | 1.7 MB 00:01 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Thu Jul 27 11:21:52 2023. michel in fedora/reviews/other took 37s ⬢ [fedora-toolbox:38] ❯ ``` Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
