Re: fedora-review workarounds for dnf5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26-07-2023 17:36, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
Hello Sandro,

I noticed that in f39 builds in Copr the directory containing the
results is now named after the package. Comparing that to the
"traditional" fedora-review directory in f38 builds, I miss the
`licensecheck.txt` file.

It suddenly started happening and I don't know what is to blame yet.
You can follow

https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service/issues/28
https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/486

I plan to work on it as soon as I can.

Thank you Jakub. I'll be following along. It's not all that urgent by any means as long as the file is still there in the stable branches.

-- Sandro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux