Hi all, On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54:43AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of > dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it > today and finally got a successful run of fedora-review after making > the following changes [*]. > I'm happy (and relieved) to say that a fixed fedora-review is ready for testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=&packages=fedora-review&status=pending&status=testing This uses Jakub Kadlcik's initial PR to use dnf-3 instead of dnf, so we don't necessarily commit ourselves to using DNF 5 until the we know for sure if Fedora 39 will ship with DNF 5 or not. Thanks also to Benjamin A. Beasley, Miro Hrončok, Benson Muite, Jitka Plesnikova, Pavel Raiskup, and Sérgio M. Basto for contributing changes shipped in this release. 0.10.0 was supposed to have gone out 3 months ago, but blocked by changes in setuptools/distutils causing our release script to generate an incomplete tarball. I've done a more thorough fix that will hopefully hold until we rewrite our build process be PEP 517 compliant for the next release. Once this lands in F38, Fedora Review Service should be fixed, unless I'm missing something. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
