On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > As I understand how DNF5 team works, they keep updating DNF5 quickly > enough even in Fedora 38 (but the 'dnf -> dnf-3' exists, instead of > 'dnf -> dnf5'). > > I'm a bit lost in the minor numbers; and Mirek is right, not all the > missing features are actually important from the Koji perspective (e.g. > forcearch). > > We keep the list of issues tracked here: > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/894 > And namely, https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/617 > seems like a showstopper ATM. At least as long as we have to check > GPG signatures at koji buildroot installation time. We don't in koji, but developers do on local mockbuilds. > Otherwise, Mock 4.1+ on Fedora 38 *host* (or in container) should just > work fine with fedora rawhide chroots and package_manager=dnf5. Don't > forget to `mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub=bootstrap` first, > because the root_cache tarball for bootstrap has the installed DNF4 > packages, not DNF5, from previous calls. We could try this out in staging, I don't think we want to push anything into prod right now since the mass rebuild starts wed. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
