On 7/14/23 17:32, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Eric Sandeen <esandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> said: >> XFS does have a hack^Wmount option to force inodes into the 32-bit >> range, but just FWIW we almost never see users running into problems >> with 32-bit applications (but maybe because they know about the >> mount option...) > > Aren't even most 32-bit applications compiled with LFS? It looks like > anything with _GNU_SOURCE will get it, and IIRC that's not uncommon. > I'm curious how many 32-bit binaries are looking at inode numbers and > are NOT already LFS compatible. I recommending that the entire distro be compiled with LFS. The non-LFS ABI is obsolete for exactly this reason. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
