On 7/11/23 15:45, Jeremy Linton wrote: > On 7/10/23 13:16, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >> On 7/10/23 02:30, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: >>> On 10/07/2023 02:49, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >>>> QtWebEngine (used by Falkon) was a >>>> month or more behind upstream Chromium last I checked. >>> >>> Qt5QtWebEngine is an extremely vulnerable thing. It still uses Chromium >>> 87.0[1]. >>> >>> Current Chromium version: 105.0. >>> >>> [1]: https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine/ChromiumVersions >> >> In that case it should be removed from the distribution. Can KDE >> mail clients be built without QtWebEngine? This would disable >> HTML email support, but plain text mail might still work. > > The problem isn't QtWebEngine, the latest Qt 6.X is using 108 according > to the link above. > > The problem seems to be that not everything has moved to the 6.x branch yet. > > https://iskdeusingqt6.org/ It’s a mixture. The best possible outcome would be for QtWebEngine to be part of upstream Chromium and use Chromium’s release schedule. Not sure if that is possible/practical. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
