On 6/27/23 05:38, Jiri Vanek wrote: > JDK will behave similarly. We ave (small) advantage that we have also > in-jdk-bundled tzdata. However fallback in case of removed system > tzdata is not automatic, and requires human touch. Long ago we have a > patch in jdk which looked to system tzdata - if they were present, > they were used. If not, the bundled copy was used. Also user could > set up on startup which to use. But it had not prooved itself, as it > was casue of weird missonfigurations. Please note that we are only talking about tzdata, not tzdata-java. We do not intend to allow the removal of tzdata-java because OpenJDK depends upon it. When you say "in-jdk-bundled tzdata" do you mean something other than tzdata-java? > If this proposal will come live, we may introduce this patch again, or > leave it as it is now - on human touch. Could you please expand a bit more on this topic? -- Cheers, Carlos. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
