Hi, On 6/27/23 12:36, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 10:40 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> So although I realize this is not entirely fair IMHO if you want to push forward with this feature then you may also be on the hook to look into reducing the memory footprint elsewhere so that the end result still fits in 2G RAM. I have some experience with tweaking the livecd to work with less RAM and I'm happy to share my experience in this, but I do not have time to actually implement needed changes for this. > > To be fair, you're writing as if it's certain that a webUI-based > Workstation live cannot install to a 2G system, but AFAIK that has not > yet been demonstrated. It would seem reasonable to test it before > deciding we have a huge blocker issue here. Right, first we need to test if this is a problem at all. That is why I wrote "*may also* be on the hook". Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue