Late follow-up...
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 2:46 AM Peter Oliver <lists.fedoraproject.org@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2023, Björn Persson wrote:
> One way to avoid all the color issues could be to just make the prompt
> bold by default. That would probably make it stand out enough in many
> situations. I think it wouldn't help much for programmers compiling
> software though, because GCC outputs filenames in uncolored bold text,
> so even a bold prompt would blend in among the compilation errors.
Right, true
Underlining or reverse video would get my vote, instead of bold.
I did play with reverse video before my original post, and found it rather "high contrast" - though it may deserve more exploration.
Dim reverse video seems more palatable perhaps.
For myself, I have a more complicated scheme that sets the prompt background colour to light grey on light terminals and dark grey on dark terminals. I find this is just enough to easily find the prompt when scrolling back, without distracting from the output I’m looking at. My instinct is that detecting the background colour too fiddly to inflict on users by default, though.
Yes, setting the background and foreground together is probably the safest way to maintain good contrast.
Jens
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
