> > This doesn't impact Fedora, but will certainly impact the various > RHEL rebuilds whether community based (AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux), > or fully commercial (Oracle OEL). Those distros can still provide > the initial point releases, but will have to do all the work to > figure out backports for bug fixes/CVEs/etc within the release. > This is going to be a serious burden for those distros. > At present Red Hat is the primary sponsor for Fedora. RHEL is one downstream of Fedora, but there are others including Amazon Linux, Alma, Rocky, CentOS, Miracle Linux, Qubes OS, Open Euler, Linpux etc. As a result, Fedora development is healthy and robust, and may cost Red Hat less than other development models. It may be good to evolve the Fedora governance model to recognize other significant contributors (both resources and time), either individually or corporate and provide a means for these contributors to also contribute to the governance of the project should they want to do so. > With regards, > Daniel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
