On Thu, Jun 22, 2023, at 11:01 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > 1. Fedora Rawhide continually updated > 2. ELN maintained in parallel, as part of Fedora > 3. At some point, ELN branched to new CentOS Stream > 4. ... a year or so of CentOS Stream development in public ... > 5. RHEL Beta forked from that, released > 6. Work on RHEL updates visible in CentOS Stream > 7. Updates appear in CentOS Stream > 8. Updates released to RHEL > > Note that with CentOS Stream 10 / RHEL 10, step 3 here will _maintain git > history from Fedora, which is a big improvement in preserving all of the > incredible, valuable work from Fedora contributors. > > All of this is the exact opposite of Red Hat preparing to make some new base > for RHEL. Additionally, this model provides a clean path for > Red-Hat-opinionated decisions to differ from those we make from Fedora. Take > BTRFS as an example. Or, the increase in CPU baseline. Like this: Matthew, this is a great summary and also the understanding I currently have. It might be a good thing if this information lives in a more permanent place that I can refer people to. Perhaps something on Fedora's documentation about the Enterprise Linux ecosystem or a blogpost on either the Fedora or RedHat blogs? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
