On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:07 PM Philip Wyett <philip.wyett@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Let us face it our efforts with the Fedora project are not valued and it is a means nothing to the > new corporate IBM/Red Hat enterprise systems that we have to struggle to get access to srpms, to > make a community. What is community now to Red Hat? I'm not particularly inclined to feel favorably toward Red Hat, but I don't see what the availability of RHEL srpms has to do with Fedora. We're upstream of RHEL. On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:26 PM Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My interpretation of the blog post, combined with recent actions > towards Fedora by Red Hat, is that Red Hat now views CentOS Stream as > the new "Fedora" for basing future versions of RHEL. Not really. Fedora is the basis for new RHEL major versions (e.g. RHEL 10). CentOS Stream is the next RHEL minor version (9.X). -- Ben Cotton (he/him) TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bcotton _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
