Re: LibreOffice packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 02/06/23 01:55, Sandro ha scritto:
>
> However, it surprises me that for a package, that is part of the
> deliverables of Fedora releases, no coordination effort was made to
> transition the package from Red Hat maintenance to Fedora maintenance. I
> would even go as far as that this should have been submitted as a change
> proposal, seeing that the package is in every (live) ISO Fedora ships.
>
> Instead the package is being dropped like a hot potato, without even the
> courtesy of an announcement beforehand [2].
>
I'm having a bad feeling about Fedora future lately, seeing all these RH 
withdrawals from the project.

I hope to be wrong. But could Fedora survive the day RH says goodbye? 
Shall we start thinking about having a structure (both government and 
financial) like libreoffice foundation?

BTW dropping RPMs for Flatpaks makes the whole Fedora philosophy 
useless. Flatpaks just bundles what they need, free software or not 
(i.e. codecs support) so upstreams have no interest in find OSS solutions.

Mattia

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux