Jeff Spaleta wrote:
below a certain length as much as possible. There is a physical
constraint here.. 80 columns is very much a defacto standard..even
email clients understand that and attempt to respect that 79/80 column
line limit. If packagenames inside this project need a 120 column
terminal to uniquely identify and use.. thats a package naming policy
problem.
But long filenames are a fact of life. They're more descriptive, and
people like to use them, hardware limitations be damned.
# rpm -ivh xorg-x11-driver-video-radeon-1-2.i386.rpm
Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
1:xorg-x11-driver-video-rad########################################### [100%]
So rpm makes a decision to display more hash signs than filename. That's
nuts, isn't it? It could just as easily display something like this,
where each hash stands for a 10% increment.
# rpm -ivh xorg-x11-driver-video-radeon-1-2.i386.rpm
Preparing... ########## [100%]
1:xorg-x11-driver-video-radeon-1-2.i386.rpm ########## [100%]
If the hashes were so dear, you could have a display like this, which
gives you much more room for the filename (over 70 chars).
# rpm -ivh xorg-x11-driver-video-radeon-1-2.i386.rpm
Preparing... ########## [100%]
1:xorg-x11-driver-video-radeon-1-2.i386.rpm
################################################################ [100%]
Same for yum, I imagine.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list