Re: OT: yum truncating (was: Re: RFC: X.Org X11 modularization project - rpm package driver naming)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/27/05, Kyrre Ness Sjobak <kyrre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What about detecting terminal size (width) and adjusting output
> according to that (like less, top, etc. does)?


while a fancy technical feature... thats going to help a few people.
it doesn't really address the underlying issue. There are many many...
many 80 column terminals in use. If package names continue to expand
to 30 or 40 characters long.. this is a problem for anyone who is
using one of those "standard" 80 column terminals.  I think its
perfectly fair for packagers to be aware of common hardware
limitations like this and to try to keep the packagename strings down
below a certain length as much as possible.  There is a physical
constraint here.. 80 columns is very much a defacto standard..even
email clients understand that and attempt to respect that 79/80 column
line limit.  If packagenames inside this project need a 120 column
terminal to uniquely identify and use.. thats a package naming policy
problem.

-jef

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux