I noticed that by default, Qubes OS has voluntary kernel preemption as opposed to full preemption. I found that enabling full preemption (preempt=full on kernel command line) makes the system significantly more responsive under heavy I/O load. In particular, if I build a kernel in a Qubes OS VM, it significantly degrades responsiveness without preempt=full. With preempt=full, the system remains responsive. The storage stack used is LVM thin provisioning on LUKS, and I have observed significant CPU usage in dom0 kernel threads with names that indicate they are related to dm-thin and dm-crypt. The kernel config used by the Qubes kernel package I use (6.1.28) is based on Fedora 37’s config, and Marek Marczykowski-Górecki (CCd) indicated that the same arguments apply to Fedora. Therefore, I am asking if Fedora should use full kernel preemption by default. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
