Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Hi,

On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 12:23 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> You use it in to fix bus names in flatpak-evolution-wrapper.sh -
> those could just be hardcoded since the bus name will be always the
> same for the Evolution Flatpak

It will work unless the version of the D-Bus service is bumped for
whatever reason. That's the only reason why the variables are part of
the .pc file, to have correct D-Bus service name provided, not hard-
coded.

In any case, I understand these are not obstacles, not the big one, if
the runtime change for the D-Bus service names will be possible. Feel
free to file an upstream bug against the evolution-data-server, thus
it's tracked (and not forgotten).

	Thanks and bye,
	Milan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux