Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 02:04:57PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> Ranjan,
> 
> On 5/14/23 13:46, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> > Thanks! The package was cleared  on BZ some time ago. Is there some additional review that is needed?
> > 
> Sorry, that is correct. Usually state is set to post. It seems to have
> been unretired:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11417

Yep.

> Though project ownership has not been updated:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oclock

It looks updated to me? Did I miss something there? 
Do let me know in the ticket if so.

> It seems Slim has been unretired:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11310
> and project ownership updated:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slim
> Maybe just need to add the new files?

Yes, it should be unretired and all ready to push commits
to/build/update.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux